Of Chiang Rai's 0 districts, 0 have a high estimated chance of poor air quality and 11 a high chance of fire risk. The highest risk is in Mueang Chiang Rai, where the fire risk level is High (based on the surrounding area).
Not enough district-level data is available for Chiang Rai yet. This page will publish full rankings once more districts are covered.
| District | PM2.5 annual mean (PCD) | PM2.5 days exceeding standard (PCD) | Fire hotspot detections (annual) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mae Lao | — | — | 15 count |
| Mae Sai | — | — | 21 count |
| Wiang Chai | — | — | 25 count |
| Wiang Chiang Rung | — | — | 40 count |
In Chiang Rai, 0 districts have a high estimated chance of poor air quality and 11 districts have a high estimated chance of fire risk.
No districts in Chiang Rai currently have a high estimated chance of poor air quality.
There is not enough data yet to state the basis of the poor air quality estimate for Chiang Rai.
11 districts in Chiang Rai have a high estimated chance of fire risk, including Mueang Chiang Rai.
The fire risk estimate for Chiang Rai's highest-risk district is based on the surrounding area.
Mueang Chiang Rai in Chiang Rai has the highest single hazard estimate, a High level of fire risk.
In areas of Chiang Rai with a High hazard estimate, ask for a site-specific survey and the property's flood history before committing — a High estimate is a prompt to investigate further, not a verdict on any single property.
Topographic view shades terrain by elevation — higher, steeper ground is generally less exposed to flooding, while low-lying land near watercourses is more exposed.
No districts in Chiang Rai currently have a high estimated chance of poor air quality.
11 districts in Chiang Rai have a high estimated chance of fire risk, including Mueang Chiang Rai.
There is not enough data yet to identify the highest-risk district in Chiang Rai.
Each district gets a Low, Medium, or High estimate for every hazard. "Observed" levels come from a directly measured event, such as a satellite-recorded flood extent. "Estimated" levels are modelled from proxies such as terrain, historical rainfall, or monitoring-station readings, and are not a forecast or a probability. A level never combines more than one hazard, and "Not enough data yet" means exactly that — not a safe rating.
A High estimate for Chiang Rai is a prompt to ask more questions — request a site-specific flood or engineering survey, check the property's ground floor level and past flood history with the seller or agent, and review local drainage before committing. A Low estimate does not guarantee a property is risk-free, and none of these levels replace a professional inspection.
| — |
| — |
| 66 count |
| Khun Tan | — | — | 69 count |
|---|
| Phaya Mengrai | — | — | 71 count |
|---|
| Phan | — | — | 121 count |
|---|
| Mae Chan | — | — | 138 count |
|---|
| Doi Luang | — | — | 185 count |
|---|
| Thoeng | — | — | 187 count |
|---|
| Wiang Kaen | — | — | 265 count |
|---|
| Mae Fa Luang | — | — | 288 count |
|---|
| Chiang Saen | — | — | 310 count |
|---|
| Chiang Khong | — | — | 410 count |
|---|
| Mueang Chiang Rai | — | — | 456 count |
|---|
| Mae Suai | — | — | 699 count |
|---|
| Wiang Pa Pao | — | — | 853 count |
|---|
The hazard estimates for Chiang Rai are sourced from Thailand data.go.th open-data catalogue -- Chiang Rai provincial office satellite hotspot detections (DETECTIONS, not fires -- one fire can register multiple detections; cloud cover suppresses detections) (Open Data Common (Thai government province office)).
Low, Medium, and High are screening estimates, not a forecast or probability. Each hazard is scored on its own — there is no single combined risk score across hazards.